Skip to main content

.design

Availability-check reliability and the registry servers we query for .design domains.

JSON

Our answer rate

Good Generic
Answer rate
100.0% of attempted checks returned a definitive answer
Check volume
Minimal (coarse band, not a count)
Mostly answered by
Registry (RDAP)
Still available
83.4% of answered .design candidates were unregistered
Last definitive answer
2026-08-25

Servers we query for .design

Public registry infrastructure — a whois, a dig NS design, and one read of IANA’s bootstrap file return the same three values. Listed here for convenience.

WHOIS host
whois.nic.design
Authoritative nameservers
b.nic.design 37.209.194.10
c.nic.design 37.209.196.10
x.nic.design 156.154.172.82
y.nic.design 156.154.173.82
z.nic.design 156.154.174.82
a.nic.design 37.209.192.10
RDAP endpoint
https://rdap.nic.design/

What this measures: the share of our own availability checks that came back with a definitive answer. Nobody else publishes this, because nobody else is running bulk registry lookups at this scale and recording what came back.

What it does not measure: a registry’s uptime or quality. A low rate here can just as easily mean our requests are being rate-limited as it can mean anything about the registry itself.

These are current-state figures, not a history. We keep one record per domain, holding its most recent check — so a TLD that failed hundreds of times and then recovered reads as healthy here. A low rate means checks are failing now; a high one does not mean they always have.

Figures count domains checked, not queries — a domain checked six times counts once. Candidates we generated but never checked are excluded entirely; they are not failures. Snapshot rebuilt 2026-09-27 02:19:47.

All tracked TLDs